Home Crime and Courts Supreme Court nullifies Paul Mwazha’s son power grab

Supreme Court nullifies Paul Mwazha’s son power grab

Paul Mwazha

Supreme Court nullifies Paul Mwazha’s son power grab. In delivering their ruling, Supreme Court judges Justices Susan Mavangira, Tendai Uchena and George Chiweshe said that the High Court’s decision be upheld as the note supposedly written by Paul Mwazha did not specifically name Alfred as the successor.

The Supreme Court has upheld, in part, High Court Judge Justice Tawanda Chitapi’s ruling, which nullified the self-appointment of Bishop Alfred Mwazha to lead the African Apostolic Church founded by his father Paul Mwazha due to old age.

Justice Mavangira said: With regards to the second ground of appeal the court a quo ruled, correctly in our view, which the handwritten note presented to it in order to prove that the Archbishop had chosen the first appellant as his successor was silent on the issue.

The learned judge a quo analysed the text of this note and came to the inevitable conclusion that there was nothing in it which spoke to the nomination of anyone (let alone the first appellant) as the successor to the Archbishop.

The learned Judge a quo cannot be faulted in that regard. For that reason, the second ground of appeal stands to be dismissed. Justice Mavangira further ruled that the church’s constitution stipulates that the Council of Bishops cannot choose a successor to the Archbishop unless he is absent “by apology, illness or death.” She said:

I agree with the appellants that clause 9.2.2 of the constitution can only be invoked in the event that the Archbishop is absent “by apology, illness or death.” It is only then that the Council of Bishops (the Priesthood Council), acting in terms of clause 9.2.2, can sit and deliberate on the question of succession.

Without therefore having made a finding as to the incapacity of the Archbishop the learned Judge erred and misdirected himself in granting an order for the invocation of clause 9.2.2. For that reason, this is a case in which the appeal succeeds in part.

According to the court papers, Alfred had publicly announced himself as the successor to Archbishop Paul Mwazha and purported to have taken over the reins of the Church, jettisoning his aged and ailing father.

Ernest Mhambare, who is a Reverent in the church, had approached High Court last year seeking to nullify the appointment, arguing that Alfred had attempted to usurp the position.

The application was granted by Justice Chitapi who ruled that Paul Mwazha would retain his position as the Archbishop, prompting Alfred and his brothers to file an appeal at the Supreme Court.

Source – Pindula News

In other news – Popular Mbare DJ up for r@pe

Popular Mbare DJ up for r@pe. The suspect Tawana Kamwendo was not asked to plead when he appeared before Harare magistrate Judith Taruvinga who remanded him in custody to October 27 and advised him to apply for bail at the High Court.

MaLovers-horz

Mbare wheel spinner DJ Malovers was on Wednesday dragged to court to answer to r@pe charges after he reportedly raped is 13-year-old girlfriend…Learn More.

Previous articleZESA announces power supply interruption in some parts of Harare
Next articleMore than 20 000 fans to attend South Africa, Zimbabwe WCQ